[CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
Trevor Hemsley
trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.comWed Mar 19 19:05:57 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 19/03/14 16:57, Dan Porter wrote: > > I like the name |server-minimal|, or even just |minimal| for the > purpose of what the current version is. > > Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. |micro|? > If it's an image without yum then I'd suggest we call it 'broken' and be done with it! There are quite enough people running systems without updates without encouraging them to do so. T -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140319/c3a69d93/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list