Hi Jeff, How small have you made (1) ? do you have a kickstart file for it? In my personal case I'd like to see (2) though, but I'll take what you have :) cheers, Jaime On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com>wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > the aim being to setup a base image, that is under 150mb to download and > > deploy. > > > > > > I think there are (at least) two different types of "minimal" that could > (and should) be provided. > > 1) "working server minimal" which would have at least yum and sshd -- > this could be similar to what we do for minimal now, though I'm not > totally opposed to shrinking it down a bit more. > > 2) "really really minimal -- and we mean minimal!" -- where the goal is > to strip out as much as possible, no docs, no yum, no ssshd, etc. > > I don't have a use for (2) personally, but use (1) -- or at least one of > my own making -- quite frequently. I'd be happy if we could keep both. > > -Jeff > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jmelis at opennebula.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140319/2b51e77a/attachment-0005.html>