On 04/25/2014 08:17 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 25.04.2014 13:49, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>> Thoughts? >> I have to play devil's advocate here. Quote from >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-February/009830.html: >> >> there are more than 100 repos out there, which ones are we going >> to add and why and >> then at that point what do the others need to do in order to also >> get >> included ? > Guys, we are beating around the bush here and missing the obvious - > which is even more obvious since the RH acquisition. > > We all know EPEL is "special"; first of all there are loads of > developers contributing to it, second it is officially part of the > RedHat world (legalese bullshit aside), third it probably has the least > number of complaints against it, implying good quality. > > Given the above I'd say it's pretty safe and useful to add epel-release > to Extras. > > Why don't we add another of the 100s of repos? Because none of the > other tick all the boxes above. > > My 2 slips of gold-pressed latinum. Agreed ... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140501/9748bfc6/attachment-0006.sig>