On 05/19/2014 11:42 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 19/05/14 10:23, Bojtos Péter wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> Can't we use the packagelist from RHEL 6 as an initial list of packages, >> which need to be "re-branded"? >> >> Peter > > Yes, that would be a good start, indeed. > Also worth noting that several packages were modified/patched because of > the logo, but *also* for functional changes. > As an example, the conga SRPM in el5/el6 has been modified to also > roll-in CentOS support (for the ricci/luci nodes) so sometimes > "branding" isn't the only thing to search for, but also functional code > change required too > > I will have 2 things done for today : 1) a guide to what debranding and rebranding implies, along with a broad set of goals to follow 2) a process to whitelist / blacklist; and must-have, good-to-have, nice-to-have, to-have-or-not-to-have list. We can then co-ordinate the effort off a github repo, we can consider content accepted from github.com to git.centos.org as being the signoff ( we can have acl's that allow a larger group to facilitate this ) regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc