On 30/05/14 22:56, Carl Trieloff wrote: > On 05/30/2014 05:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 30/05/14 18:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> On 30 May 2014 11:02, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>>> As we gear up for the upcoming CentOS 7 release, we're tracking a few >>>> things for the CentOSPlus kernel as well. One of the proposals (via >>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 ) is that we change the current >>>> name of the centosplus kernel to be a bit more consistent with other >>>> kernel names. The proposed new name would look like 'kernel-plus' or >>>> 'kernel-centosplus'. This is in keeping with other kernel names such as >>>> 'kernel-ml', 'kernel-xen', 'kernel-lt' etc. And allows for >>>> /etc/sysconfig/kernel to be used to set the DEFAULTKERNEL as desired. >>>> >>>> >>> kernel-plus sounds good. I think it would help deal with bugs a bit better. >>> kernel-centosplus is a bit long but might be clearer in case a downstream >>> wants to have its own plus kernel. >>> >>> >> How about kernel-cplus as a compromise to the above. > makes me think of a language & not centos... Or just kernel-centos T