[CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5
Alemesegd GIDEY
alexyigidey.ag at gmail.com
Sat Nov 15 13:00:01 UTC 2014
On 11/15/14, Alemesegd GIDEY <alexyigidey.ag at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request at centos.org
> <centos-devel-request at centos.org> wrote:
>> Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
>> centos-devel at centos.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> centos-devel-request at centos.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> centos-devel-owner at centos.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>> 2. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar)
>> 3. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them
>> (Gururaj S Alagwadi)
>> 4. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson)
>> 5. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel)
>> 6. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>> 7. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000
>> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
>> To: centos-devel at centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID: <5459E064.8090608 at karan.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org
>>> <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>>> secondary
>>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is
>>> just
>>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>>>
>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>>> fill
>>> it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>>
>>>
>>> ?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday
>>> afternoon GMT works for me.
>>>
>>> Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss?
>>>
>>
>> I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch
>> agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is
>> largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karanbir Singh
>> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
>> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800
>> From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com>
>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID:
>> <CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary
>>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just
>>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting. Please include me
>> and
>>> the others on the needtomeet request. Thx,
>>> -Jeff
>>>
>>> Jeffrey J. Scheel
>>
>> Please include me in the invite for next call.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141105/28a77485/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:33:26 +0530
>> From: Gururaj S Alagwadi <agururaj at in.ibm.com>
>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID:
>> <OFE3B9CBAA.BF7E8BAF-ON65257D87.00585E03-65257D87.0058939D at in.ibm.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hello Karanbir,
>>
>> Please include me on your next invite.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Guru
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Gururaj Alagwadi
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com>
>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>> Date: 11/05/2014 08:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them
>> Sent by: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary
>>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just
>>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.? Please include me
>> and
>>> the others on the needtomeet request.? Thx,
>>> -Jeff
>>>
>>> Jeffrey J. Scheel
>>
>>
>> Please include me in the invite for next call.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>>_______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:21:03 +0100
>> From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se>
>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID: <545B599F.3010109 at takeit.se>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core
>>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on
>>>> these.
>>>
>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>>
>>
>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>>
>> - --
>> AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74 A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUW1mfAAoJEPRXt6Nd8UJAuN0P/2IOongVIGbUWNcQAosBMtWv
>> aB5u8KO84TOadRPcjZY5JFDLEJQk/oqEzwo4Qix9PtAT9j4iicfo+EUK+6vdfDRv
>> rqEqK8bP4oFhXbJqcM0sehPUKOI4O5lTfJ+3uSkO3mD3M1PognbKOY5QX4TQAt6n
>> KPL0TTkniS5J0oRH5O6msuiscCy00/MAu1s7imczKbwqCCmgKhvfov8EQb8DyGNy
>> /wu/Qi/kCcuARQey843rlMdCc2wYjo6ZvJU73sn5pUBid3ZfdLePwZJZb3wXXdek
>> i5uPCCbRsbuYTy1bwB3ibz6p9MPg7fq5EYIa7ci5vWS5fjnRauP+lhVCOcE0nTxN
>> wCDMbtB+N8kMI+yW11WUOZ3b+DMu/DrVwEF384IMtJrBTqnFrobaf6W85vqxaagc
>> 0G0EZeoNeJylWYAWMkUFZQ/Vqj2+BG/4qGloWF/ChMSTueOHCRUW6t9XyeNKirNV
>> bt974wsSWzTM25nbkseSskLNj1n7pa+wETyUhA6B8Om5C1uT/MABTxLcz4Doj5Xq
>> IW7V+1GQN/bPtjonrvWscEo2u6/oWV/sneemketoJY/HN4D+AQQ0MUVhBB8X0vtB
>> IOKAIl/i7e7hJwNd34+Pb8v7YIaG1KWQjIVTmYlNbSzKPaEgCxMalciWr2W33Zz/
>> NIrS457rBG+dJ9309CQz
>> =LKaT
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:25:53 -0600
>> From: Jeffrey Scheel <scheel at us.ibm.com>
>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID:
>> <OFFF9E4E05.EAAA1DB3-ON86257D88.003EA106-86257D88.003ECB4F at us.ibm.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03:
>>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next?
>> -Jeff
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Scheel
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141106/2a41e9f0/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:29:27 +0000
>> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
>> To: centos-devel at centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID: <545B5B97.8010701 at karan.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
>> On 11/06/2014 11:21 AM, Elias Persson wrote:
>>> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>>>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core
>>>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on
>>>>> these.
>>>
>>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>>>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>>
>> i am easy, i think we are all trustable folks here :) plus there is an
>> email generated everytime someone fills things in.
>>
>> --
>> Karanbir Singh
>> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
>> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:51 +0000
>> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
>> To: centos-devel at centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
>> them
>> Message-ID: <545B5BEB.7010706 at karan.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
>> On 11/06/2014 11:25 AM, Jeffrey Scheel wrote:
>>> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03:
>>>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin
>>>> rights.
>>>> Should probably have been
>>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>>>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>
>>> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next?
>>> -Jeff
>>>
>>
>> I think Thu 11am UTC looks to be the best spot for people, lets try and
>> hit that for the 13th. I'll setup the hangout and send out urls shortly.
>> We are limited to 12 people on the session at one time and i think we
>> have 11 listed up ( hopefully, i can be the 12th! ).
>>
>> we can likely repeat the session in 2 weeks time, on the 27th.
>>
>> - KB
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karanbir Singh
>> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
>> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>>
>> End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5
>> ********************************************
>>
>
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list