[CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5

On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request at centos.org
<centos-devel-request at centos.org> wrote:
> Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
> 	centos-devel at centos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	centos-devel-request at centos.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	centos-devel-owner at centos.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>    2. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar)
>    3. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them
>       (Gururaj S Alagwadi)
>    4. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson)
>    5. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel)
>    6. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>    7. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000
> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
> To: centos-devel at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID: <5459E064.8090608 at karan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org
>> <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>     > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>> secondary
>>     > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is
>> just
>>     > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>>
>>     http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>> fill
>>     it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>
>>
>> ?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday
>> afternoon GMT works for me.
>>
>> Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss?
>>
>
> I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch
> agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is
> largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that.
>
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800
> From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID:
> 	<CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary
>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just
>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.  Please include me
> and
>> the others on the needtomeet request.  Thx,
>> -Jeff
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Scheel
>
> Please include me in the invite for next call.
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141105/28a77485/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:33:26 +0530
> From: Gururaj S Alagwadi <agururaj at in.ibm.com>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID:
> 	<OFE3B9CBAA.BF7E8BAF-ON65257D87.00585E03-65257D87.0058939D at in.ibm.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello Karanbir,
>
> Please include me on your next invite.
>
> Regards,
> Guru
>
> ______________________________________________
> Gururaj Alagwadi
>
>
>
> From:	Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar at ashnik.com>
> To:	"The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Date:	11/05/2014 08:59 PM
> Subject:	Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them
> Sent by:	centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary
>> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just
>> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
>> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.? Please include me
> and
>> the others on the needtomeet request.? Thx,
>> -Jeff
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Scheel
>
>
> Please include me in the invite for next call.
>
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>_______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:21:03 +0100
> From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID: <545B599F.3010109 at takeit.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core
>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on
>>> these.
>>
>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>
>
> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>
> - --
> AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74  A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUW1mfAAoJEPRXt6Nd8UJAuN0P/2IOongVIGbUWNcQAosBMtWv
> aB5u8KO84TOadRPcjZY5JFDLEJQk/oqEzwo4Qix9PtAT9j4iicfo+EUK+6vdfDRv
> rqEqK8bP4oFhXbJqcM0sehPUKOI4O5lTfJ+3uSkO3mD3M1PognbKOY5QX4TQAt6n
> KPL0TTkniS5J0oRH5O6msuiscCy00/MAu1s7imczKbwqCCmgKhvfov8EQb8DyGNy
> /wu/Qi/kCcuARQey843rlMdCc2wYjo6ZvJU73sn5pUBid3ZfdLePwZJZb3wXXdek
> i5uPCCbRsbuYTy1bwB3ibz6p9MPg7fq5EYIa7ci5vWS5fjnRauP+lhVCOcE0nTxN
> wCDMbtB+N8kMI+yW11WUOZ3b+DMu/DrVwEF384IMtJrBTqnFrobaf6W85vqxaagc
> 0G0EZeoNeJylWYAWMkUFZQ/Vqj2+BG/4qGloWF/ChMSTueOHCRUW6t9XyeNKirNV
> bt974wsSWzTM25nbkseSskLNj1n7pa+wETyUhA6B8Om5C1uT/MABTxLcz4Doj5Xq
> IW7V+1GQN/bPtjonrvWscEo2u6/oWV/sneemketoJY/HN4D+AQQ0MUVhBB8X0vtB
> IOKAIl/i7e7hJwNd34+Pb8v7YIaG1KWQjIVTmYlNbSzKPaEgCxMalciWr2W33Zz/
> NIrS457rBG+dJ9309CQz
> =LKaT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:25:53 -0600
> From: Jeffrey Scheel <scheel at us.ibm.com>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID:
> 	<OFFF9E4E05.EAAA1DB3-ON86257D88.003EA106-86257D88.003ECB4F at us.ibm.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03:
>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
> Cool, thanks!
>
> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next?
> -Jeff
>
> Jeffrey J. Scheel
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141106/2a41e9f0/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:29:27 +0000
> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
> To: centos-devel at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID: <545B5B97.8010701 at karan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On 11/06/2014 11:21 AM, Elias Persson wrote:
>> On 2014-10-31 18:16, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various
>>>> secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core
>>>> SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on
>>>> these.
>>
>>> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and
>>> fill it out and lets make something happen next week.
>>
>>
>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>
> i am easy, i think we are all trustable folks here :) plus there is an
> email generated everytime someone fills things in.
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:51 +0000
> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
> To: centos-devel at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
> 	them
> Message-ID: <545B5BEB.7010706 at karan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On 11/06/2014 11:25 AM, Jeffrey Scheel wrote:
>> Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> wrote on 11/06/2014 05:21:03:
>>> I think you shared the wrong URI there... That one gets me admin rights.
>>> Should probably have been http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=602tt0s6V
>>> (found by clicking "Attendee link").
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> Have we picked a time this week or are we going to defer to next?
>> -Jeff
>>
>
> I think Thu 11am UTC looks to be the best spot for people, lets try and
> hit that for the 13th. I'll setup the hangout and send out urls shortly.
> We are limited to 12 people on the session at one time and i think we
> have 11 listed up ( hopefully, i can be the 12th! ).
>
> we can likely repeat the session in 2 weeks time, on the 27th.
>
> - KB
>
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
> End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BulkUploadCsvTemplate.csv
Type: text/csv
Size: 234 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141115/79459932/attachment-0003.csv>