On 11/18/2014 01:07 PM, Mike McLean wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org > <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote: > > >> 5) vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm > >> > >> Centos has just one build of vdsm, which does not appear on ftp.rh.c. > > > > /var/ftp/pub/nfs/mirror/centos-second/vault/SRPMS/6.1/updates/SRPMS/vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm > > > > I see it as from the 6.1 era according to my 'additive' > > mirroring ... additive in the sense that uniquely named files > > are not deleted once seen, using a bit of basename() > > post-processing > > yeah, i remember this one - it was mis-released upstream iirc, and then > later moved aronud ( was it a rhev package ?? ) > > > Yes, it appears to have been part of rhev-h. > > So if it was an error, should we exclude it from the import? I would say no if: 1. It is not maintained by CentOS 2. It was mistakenly released into the stream only once upstream, and then removed. 3. It was removed by CentOS. Since all of those are true, I would say we do not need to import it. It does not hurt anything to have it in git either, but I don't think it is required though. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141119/cf38f077/attachment-0008.sig>