[CentOS-devel] Policy for Ad-Hoc Upstreams: Development Hosting
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Oct 23 18:44:28 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Policy for Ad-Hoc Upstreams: Development Hosting
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Policy for Ad-Hoc Upstreams: Development Hosting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > It does indeed. This circles back to a discussion several months ago on > this list about tiered repositories, best practices, etc. We've known > for a while that this would come up, but before it was mostly just > discussion and theory. Now we're looking at putting it into practice > with deliverable content. > So was/is there a theoretical resolution of how to handle tiered/alternative packages either where concurrent installations conflict or where concurrent installations are desirable along with a way to distinguish which instance you want to run. In this context, I'm not sure it is even relevant whether or not these packages come from different repositories. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Policy for Ad-Hoc Upstreams: Development Hosting
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Policy for Ad-Hoc Upstreams: Development Hosting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list