[CentOS-devel] Importing of of CentOS-6 SRPMS for git.centos.org

On 10/30/2014 11:50 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org
> <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote:
> 
>     As was discussed before, CentOS-6 SRPMS are going to be imported into
>     git.centos.org <http://git.centos.org> as well and will be processed
>     like CentOS-7 ones are now.
> 
>     We want to bring everything in from 6.0 initial and through 6.4+updates
>     initially, then we will do 6.5+updates (as that is changing right now).
> 
>     So, I have created a 6.0 to 6.4 set of lists.  These lists live at this
>     location:
> 
>     http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/EL6-Import/
> 
>     The two lists so far are:
> 
>     EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt
>     centos-6-srpms-modified.txt
> 
>     1.  The EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt is all SRPMS used in CentOS-6 in
>     their unmodified form.  The order they appear in the file is the order
>     they will be imported into git.  What is important for history is that
>     (for each NAME) they are imported in the correct order, so from 6.0
>     through 6.4+updates, the order of packages used in CentOS-6 for
>     389-ds-base would be:
> 
>     389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6_1.3.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6_2.2.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-15.el6.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-18.el6_3.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-20.el6_3.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-11.el6.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.src.rpm
>     389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.src.rpm
> 
>     All of these packages will come from ftp.redhat.com
>     <http://ftp.redhat.com> and be imported.
> 
> 
> I'm running a test import of the nonmod ones and it appears a number in
> the list have the wrong dist tag in the name.
> For example, bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6.src.rpm should be
> bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2.src.rpm (e.g. .el6_2 instead of .el6). Can you
> confirm?

Yes, those were wrong in centos .. for those, I think we have the centos
name.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20141030/1402cce8/attachment-0004.sig>