On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 10/07/2014 06:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I so, cool. May I also assume that you don't mean to include CentOS 5 >> in this? Or is that also in the longer term plans? > Maybe ... we are taking this one step at a time and we want to fix a > couple underlying issues with git.centos.org (the cache thing that shows > multiple projects for the same repo, etc). But the overall goal is at > some point to do all the sources exactly the same for all projects, be > it base OS versions or SIG versions, etc ... and all of them on > git.centos.org. All very cool. >> And, hmm. How *should* we best write the plural of SRPM? > > I usually do SRPMs ... or SRPMS :) > > Kind of like how do we say CentOS ... is it centos like mentos (the > candy), is it like cintas or is it like Cent (ie a penny) and the > letters O S. We don't really care as long as you use it :D So you'd be willing to use "Centalabra"?