On 10/31/2014 05:45 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 10/31/2014 12:40 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> On 10/31/2014 12:03 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>> For those of you who have been asking about software collections... >>> >>> We've been working to make it more developer/contributor friendly in >>> true upstream fashion (and also so that we can provide proper builds). >>> >>> Feel free to observe or participate in the discussion. >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2014-October/msg00007.html >>> >>> >>> >> Has there been any discussion as to how the branches within git will be >> named? > > > That discussion has been started, but I don't believe it's been resolved > yet. Please feel free to participate/contribute. I'd imagine this > discussion will bleed across both lists, but I'd prefer to keep it on > the sclo list for now to help them see the community interest and > involvement. > this would also be a great example of how we can work with a dist-git layout and an upstream git repo in git.centos.org; maybe best to thrash out the best formats for this and branch naming etc in the scl list -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc