[CentOS-devel] getting epel-release into CentOS-7- extras/

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:10:20 -0700
Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >  >
> > > FWIW, epel-release-6 is %config(noreplace) on the repo file --
> > > meaning it won't overwrite user-modified repo files.  It might be
> > > worthwhile to have %config for the initial release of
> > > epel-release-7 (specifically to ensure that "gpgcheck=1" gets
> > > added), but after that I'd rather see it as "noreplace".  I'll
> > > comment on the bug to see if we can get that sorted out.
> >
> > that would be a good thing to get in - i think the config files
> > should survive a rpm update for site customisations.
> >
> 
> 
> I spoke with Jim about this on IRC and he and I are in agreement that
> it's best to sort it out within EPEL instead of having CentOS make
> any changes to the package.

I just submitted an epel-release update. Testing and karma welcome. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140902/208d1d02/attachment.sig>