On Sep 16 12:22, Karsten Wade wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/16/2014 09:32 AM, Brian Stinson wrote: > > On Sep 16 17:23, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Should we try and get a ToDo List together for the outstanding > >> work ? That gives us a target to drive towards. Maybe even a > >> trello board, so we can easily monitor who's doing what and who > >> needs help where. > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | > >> twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : > >> http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > >> _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel > >> mailing list CentOS-devel at centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > That sounds like a good idea, Is there already a Trello > > organization out there? I'm wondering if we should include the > > bugtracker as well. > > I missed the meeting this week but read the log. It seemed one of our > major blockers in the auth system. I was thinking it might be useful > if we setup an instance of FreeIPA and Fedora Account System (FAS) to > do a side-by-side comparison? > > I'm available to work on the FAS instance this week, if there is > anyone with FAS experience who can help or give advice, please do. :) > I'm asking Fabian if he can setup a few of VMs for the auth tryout - > something disposable where folks helping can get ssh + sudo to do the > work. Just to be accurate, we may want to have a separate VM for the > database as that's likely how we'd configure it in the end. > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fas/blob/develop/INSTALL > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/el/6/x86_64/ > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/el/7/x86_64/ > > Fedora is currently running FAS2 on EL6, primarily due to TurboGears > requirements. I was told we can run the Postgres instance on CentOS 7, > but trying to do the FAS2 on CentOS 7 sounds like a bit of a rathole > right now. Anyway, lots of *.centos.org runs on CentOS 6, so no > worries there. (FAS3 is coming end-of-year aiui, and it will run on > CentOS 7.) > > Anyone interested in setting up FreeIPA for a comparison? > > We do know of one blocker for FreeIPA, which is that it doesn't have > user self-service features - you can't reset your own password, etc. > That may not be a problem for us if we have <200 users on the > Koji+git, but if we use IPA for more than that, we'll have a scaling > problem. One option is to code the module(s) ourselves, which is > nothing I'm able to do. :) > > - - Karsten > - -- > Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff > http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com > @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iEYEARECAAYFAlQYjgwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFjLwCgnztaF5ae3eE+QfZ0gUNwEjDS > YJ8AoImKkyZyvcpyG6sDIylGLQ5TREn8 > =/u2H > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I suppose that's my cue to actually post links to the minutes from our Monday meeting! Sorry for the oversight everyone. Summary: http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/september/centos-devel.2014-09-15-13.01.html Chatlog: http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/september/centos-devel.2014-09-15-13.01.log.html Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson at ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk