[CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS

[Jason Brooks]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks at redhat.com>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:04:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org>
> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:07:12 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
> > 
> 
> ...
> > 
> > Given the conflicting requirements, would it make sense to have appropriate
> > tags such that, a particular 'docker' (something with RH patches) build
> > only
> > makes it to atomic, while another 'docker' build makes it to virt7-release
> > (only upstream docker sources)
> 
> +1
> 
> I think it makes sense for everything atomic needs to live in atomic7,
> and if atomic wants the same version as virt has, great, if not, atomic
> could have its own.

I just tried a tree compose w/ docker-master, but it Provides 
docker-io, not docker, so yum's trying to pull in plain "docker"
as well, which conflicts...

> 
> Jason
>