[CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS

I'm hoping to reach a decision on how we handle docker rpms (vanilla +/- rh
patches)

There's the default docker that CentOS gets in extras from RHEL which comes
with RH patches (of course). But this kinda comes quite a bit after upstream
docker releases.

Next up is 'docker' in virt SIG which usually tracks upstream releases. Would
people prefer this build be vanilla upstream or with RH patches included.

Then there is 'docker-master' in virt SIG which is a daily rebuild of docker
upstream master branch + redhat patches.

We could either:

a) ship 'docker' in virt SIG with RH patches and also provide a
'docker-upstream' which is a vanilla upstream package

b) ship 'docker' in virt SIG without any RH patches and provide a
'docker-redhat' with RH patches

c) ...anything else??

Comments?

-- 
Lokesh
Freenode, OFTC: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150416/0815c9a4/attachment-0003.sig>