[CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
George Dunlap
dunlapg at umich.eduTue Apr 21 12:55:19 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I've pretty much decided that 'docker' in virt SIG would only track upstream > sources (no RH patches in it). Don't want this to sound like "I don't care > what anyone says", but docker upstream and many CentOS users want a build > which will only track upstream docker sources. Having 'docker' in virt SIG to > be this build sounds like the way to go. It sounds like you care what "many CentOS users want", which is hardly "I don't care what anyone says". :-) That sounds like a perfectly reasonable decision. -George
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list