[CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
Jason Brooks
jbrooks at redhat.comWed Apr 29 23:04:52 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:07:12 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS > ... > > Given the conflicting requirements, would it make sense to have appropriate > tags such that, a particular 'docker' (something with RH patches) build only > makes it to atomic, while another 'docker' build makes it to virt7-release > (only upstream docker sources) +1 I think it makes sense for everything atomic needs to live in atomic7, and if atomic wants the same version as virt has, great, if not, atomic could have its own. Jason
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list