On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:04:55AM +1200, Peter wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/08/2015 09:35 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > Given that we now have a lot of co-operation amongst > > CentOS-RHEL-Fedora, I was hoping we could host CentOS bugs on RH's > > bugzilla instance itself under a CentOS product, just like how we > > have Fedora and RHEL products. > > > > My guess is this should make life easier for people who file/deal > > with bugs related to all 3 distros. > > I can certainly see the upside to such a move. A lot of CentOS bugs > are actually bugs that need to be re-filed upstream with RedHat. If > we were to use bugzilla then it should be possible to simply change > the project from CentOS to RHEL in the bug itself rather than > requiring that it be re-filed n bugzilla, saving a lot of time and > grief and the ever present, "you've filed this bug in the wrong place, > go file it in bugzilla for RHEL". > > The main downside I can see, and one I would like to make sure doesn't > happen before any such move is made is that the RedHat Bugzilla is > known to close off a lot of bugs which would better serve the > community if they were left public. It seems like when I see a > bugzilla number mentioned in a RedHat changelog it is usually the case > that I cannot view the bug entry in bugzilla. I would want to make > certain that CentOS bugs, as well as bugs that initially filed for > CentOS and then changed to RHEL, would remain publicly viewable except > in the most extreme security cases, and even then they should be > private for only as long as it takes to release a fix. Could you provide some sample bug ids that were closed off to the public? I can forward this concern to the powers that be. > > > Peter > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJGKXAAoJEAUijw0EjkDvUJQH/2HfSemq1wBKeO3jC3+BxIkk > nhYiEKFfMKIpQ1YITC5gZ7QQhOQ38Wr4tH+zfLzodb7MaLB5WHZ+WDMZfifJalxF > QFzHzylaylyRtDNk0pHB2Dl/0KCaa7qiwfkIVAK5+fvdNvUd+JSmlqP0cRHMDxXK > zR0q74rkzUC+cesXgetQFI+/60oqh6FtY8gzV4KHJR5e5oe1ZjwEHyOQxKLh8ii/ > 12FLZ7aVJo68lwbXzJrbpft+JhCXbh/dOTmObkYXLOVekK9PIZx4Aq0izL4v19CO > a45789niCZ24zFFI5OyluAKVmJzeu/qTzckThAt7zawPi1r2dmyv/MRMrBDrdVg= > =X0vq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150408/bb7a0d6c/attachment-0008.sig>