On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:49:32 -0700 Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/07/2015 02:35 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > Given that we now have a lot of co-operation amongst > > CentOS-RHEL-Fedora, I was hoping we could host CentOS bugs on RH's > > bugzilla instance itself under a CentOS product, just like how we > > have Fedora and RHEL products. > > A few questions that come to mind ... > > What is the SLA that Fedora has around bugzilla.redhat.com? (One clear > advantage of running our own bug tracker is full autonomy.) There's no formal SLA that I know of (I'd love to be wrong!). That said, bugzilla has proved pretty stable over the years. Sometimes it's slow, there have been a few outages, but overall it's pretty reliable. > What is the process like to get changes made to Bugzilla to support > project needs? Depends. On the Fedora side we have a account that has permissions to do a number of things with the "Fedora" product. So, we can just manage all that ourselves without bothering anyone else. I would expect/hope CentOS would get something setup similarly. > Are we able to have all the granularity we need as just a sub-product > in Bugzilla? (E.g. for SIGs where we might have multiple versions of a > package for the same major version of CentOS.) I guess that would need some kind of tree setup: CentOS product SIG 1 package foo SIG 2 package foo > Can CentOS QA or security track issues privately as part of a group in > the product? (By this I include being able to block all other users > including @redhat.com accounts.) The bugzilla folks have been open to creating new groups and such in the past. For example abrt sometimes marks bugs private when it thinks they have a high security impact. In fedora this marks them now in a group that the fedora maintainer can read/unmark, etc. ...snip... I'm not in a good position to answer the rest of the excellent questions here. Hopefully those that use the current centos bug tracker/qa folks, etc will chime in with thoughts on these. kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150408/d9b287a8/attachment-0008.sig>