On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:46:31 -0500 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Projects which are aimed at the EL-7 -> EL-8 space will get a lot > >> of pushback from users when things get updated (this is the reason > >> openstack and various other tools have had to been pulled from > >> EPEL in the past..) > > > > That's partly because there are a *lot* of components in EPEL 6 than > > are present in EPEL 7. I ran headlong into this trying to build up > > RT version 4, the perl dependencies include something like 20 perl > > module SRPM's that are not in EPEL 7 or in CentOS 7. Many of them > > are available in EPEL 6. > > Do you know if there is some showstopper reason for this or is is just > that it takes a long time to get done? I just noticed the other day > that backuppc isn't there either. > http://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2014/11/26/how-packages-are-added-to-epel-7/ kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150408/3937498e/attachment-0008.sig>