On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I'm hoping to reach a decision on how we handle docker rpms (vanilla +/- rh > patches) > > There's the default docker that CentOS gets in extras from RHEL which comes > with RH patches (of course). But this kinda comes quite a bit after upstream > docker releases. > > Next up is 'docker' in virt SIG which usually tracks upstream releases. Would > people prefer this build be vanilla upstream or with RH patches included. > > Then there is 'docker-master' in virt SIG which is a daily rebuild of docker > upstream master branch + redhat patches. > > We could either: > > a) ship 'docker' in virt SIG with RH patches and also provide a > 'docker-upstream' which is a vanilla upstream package > > b) ship 'docker' in virt SIG without any RH patches and provide a > 'docker-redhat' with RH patches What do the RH patches actually do? I think either one could make sense depending on how much value the patches provide / how much they cost to port to the latest release. -George