On Aug 10 10:59, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/08/15 10:54, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > On 10/08/15 09:43, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > >> On 10/08/15 10:22, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >>> hi, > >> > >>> What are the main concerns for hosting some builder hardware > >>> geo-distributed from the main koji hub ? Apart from the > >>> latency thing, but given that most builders spend all their > >>> time in mock root builds and then the rpmbuild, if we can get > >>> gbit links to the remote machines, we should be ok right ? > >> > >>> regards, > >> > >> > >> well, a robust vpn solution in place, as all koji builders need > >> access to the (nfs shared) central repo. But instead of just > >> having gbit link at the remote machines end, we should start then > >> by having gbit link at the origin, which will not be the case. > > > > Are you saying that the blades in the same blade center dont have a > > gbit link to each other ? isnt that where / how the present koji > > origin is setup ? > > > > No, but you were talking about geo-distributed, so surely not in the > same DC, and so the remark for the need for a gbit internet > connection. The link we have is actually shared with multiple > projects, so no QoS on that and I don't know how the nfs-though-vpn IO > operations will handle that. I guess remote builders don't need really > gbit either .. people experienced with Koji should now answer :-) > > - -- > > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlXIZ/EACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5uyACaAjiG9ry78cuoeOXi+2LxyNl0 > 9rMAoIgQJLtiwKkNxVPQZGueCx1nLiFt > =RBKY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Network/physical security (definitely a VPN) should be high on our list of things to think about since the builders have access to /mnt/koji. Fast networks are nice to have too :) --Brian