Am 18.08.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 08/18/2015 06:03 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> This place may be more appropriate then centos-list. >> My subscription is new therefore sorry, if already asked: >> >> How is the centos policy for EL6 SCL packages? I see some >> activities about a sclo7 branch but how is the status for >> rhscl especially el6's ones? >> > thanks for answering > I was under the impression that the SCL SIG was doing all SCLs for el6 > and el7. > > If they are not doing el6, I can maintain the ones we currently have in > EL6, but I am not adding things where all the build requirements are not > complete (ie maven, java, etc.) in 6Server/en/RHSCL are a lot of more packages then in centos.org/6.7/SCL/, so - providing at least that packages that already were released would make sense. > I can maintain updates for the ones we currently have released > if the SIG or softwarecollections.org is not maintaining them. I do not see at softwarecollections.org something that correlates for example with: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1629.html For sure others have also some CentOS SCL packages in use. Therefore thanks in advance for your effort to closing the gap. -- LF