[CentOS-devel] What base OS should I run koji on?

[Mike McLean]

Err, wait, you said for EPEL and Fedora,... that would be this doc.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system



On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Mike McLean <mikem at imponderable.org> wrote:

> From the context, sounds like he just wants to run the koji client.
> Have you followed these docs?
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentosPackager
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2015 1:53 a.m., "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm afraid thus is the third time I've tried to get koji working to
>> submit packages for EPEL and Fedora, and once again I'm stuck. I've
>> activated a fresh Fedora 23 build, gotten my bugzillas and credentials
>> working, but cannot make even a scratch rebuild if an existing Fedora SRPM
>> for proof of concept test.
>> >
>> > What base OS are people using for Koji packaging? I've built up roughly
>> 200 SRPM kits that I publish at github.com, and I'd really like to be
>> able to publish some of my old favorites to EPEL and Fedora.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Nico do you mean the OS to run *koji* on or the client side to submit
>> jobs to fedoras koji instance?
>>
>> So far as I recall koji in Fedora land runs current - ie F23 at this time.
>>
>> As a packager I use F23 for the client, but that is essentially only
>> because I find Fedora a better desktop OS for me. Since the client only
>> really does a login event and pushes an srpm it should be pretty much
>> distro agnostic.
>>
>> Also if you mean submitting to Fedora koji keep in mind these packages
>> have to be suitable for EPEL/Fedora as per their policies (legal side of
>> things if only scratch).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20151210/926eefb3/attachment.html>