On 11/24/2015 02:26 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> wrote: >> On 11/24/2015 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 11/24/2015 04:15 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>> hi, there are many packages missing from >>>> http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/x86_64/ eg: libgcc libffi > >>> No .. but there should not be any missing >>> >>> I can find any that are not there and get them there. There is >>> nothing named libffi in centos-6 .. at least 6.7. >>> >>> So there should be no debuginfo files for any of those anyway. >> >> # rpm -qi libffi >> Name : libffi Relocations: (not relocatable) >> Version : 3.0.5 Vendor: CentOS >> Release : 3.2.el6 Build Date: Thu 11 Nov >> 2010 09:25:12 PM CET > > Judging from that old date, I suspect this was from the 6.0 days and > is one of those debuginfo packages that were "lost forever". ?? > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > That is possible, there were some packages lost. That was indeed built as part of 6.2 and those debuginfo files are lost, if a debuginfo rpm was produced. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20151201/9faee9d5/attachment-0007.sig>