On 12/09/2015 10:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > On 09/12/15 15:54, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> As background. I am kind of hesitant to break the linunwind that we are >> going to release in the new CentOS tree while this bug is being sorted >> out that the EPEL version is newer than the RHEL 7.2 version here: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288313 >> >> I know you are on that bug as well. >> >> My issue with putting the EPEL version in CentOS Extras is that then >> when we release 7.2.1511 it will be newer than the version in our OS >> tree until Red Hat does their epoch thing as discussed on the bug. >> >> Obviously they don't want to use the new version if libunwind from EPEL, >> if that were going to he the course of action, I would do it. Since it >> is not, and they want the current version tehy have in RHEL 7.2, I would >> rather wait. Does this make sense? > > We are actually in agreement already, as I wasn't suggesting for > libunwind from EPEL to be included in CentOS Extras. Rather, I was > suggesting that the libunwind from CentOS-CR be included in CentOS > Extras. That way NGINX from EPEL can be installed and most importantly > the upgrade paths for both RHEL and CentOS are kept intact. > > (I do appreciate there is limited time and other more important > priorities, such as the release of CentOS.) OK, I did some testing and I put the 7.2 version in 7.1 CentOS extras and that seems OK. In 30 minutes or so, it should be on mirror.centos.org. Please test and see if that works in the interim. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20151209/4fdc88f3/attachment-0008.sig>