On 12/09/2015 02:28 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > This is a terrible solution. Its a kludge for the best way, and just > highlights the dire need for EPEL to be better integrated into the > CentOS side of things. How should EPEL resolve the situation? If they kept their own libunwind package, that would violate their policy against conflicting with packages in RHEL. EPEL could have two branches, for RHEL and CentOS separately, and push packages to the CentOS repo when CentOS catches up with RHEL. That seems like a lot of work to cover a relatively rare problem. I don't see another reasonable way they could resolve the situation, as long as CentOS and RHEL are on asynchronous release schedules. It seems like CentOS might be able to partially resolve the problem by beginning work on their update releases when RHEL goes into beta, rather than waiting for general availability. I don't know if those packages are or could be available to CentOS during beta, though. There's some risk that RH would make changes that would invalidate some of the work done during beta, but I don't know how often that happens in practice. What are your thoughts?