On 06/02/15 11:46, Vladimir Stackov wrote: > Why not just distribute elrepo-like kernels where -lt will represent > latest long-term and -ml for mainline branch? someone is going to haveto maintain these, and it might be easier if a larger group was focusing on a smaller set of packages. having said that, if you offer to maintain whatever is the latest LTS kernel release, you are most welcome to do that. > > 2015-02-06 14:25 GMT+03:00 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: >> Hi, >> >> lots of people in various SIGs and user side projects are keen on >> bringing up a mainline kernel, that tracks upstream closer than the >> distro kernel does. >> >> I'd like to start a conversation around which kernel we might be able to >> maintain as a group, that also helps most people solve the problems they >> are looking at. >> >> 3.18 seems to be the stable-release at the moment, but given that 3.19 >> is just around the corner, should we try and aim for that ? >> >> regards >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc