On 02/11/2015 02:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote: > On 02/10/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos >> hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with >> properly maintained content from centos.org ? >> > > There are two things we identified as blocking us at [1]: > a. authtag -- thing that allows non-admin users to push/import srpms > into rpms/ namespace > b. centpkg build ready with all features hacked Well, Remi actually brought me to reconsidering a bit if we actually really need those two things to start building collections -- we can build from srpm and have collections in sclX-testing repo right now actually. Then, we can rebuild from koji once the auth/centpkg is ready. That way we won't have signed packages and have anything in scl7-release (where only builds from scm can be placed, as I understood, is it correct?), but we may be fine with that for now. Does it make sense? Still cross-posting :) but would prefer to move to sclorg at redhat.com.. Honza > Anybody knows about progress with those? > > As soon as we have (a) we can import srpms into centos (should be > script-able). Then, as soon as we have (b) and all packages built, we > can remove copr-built RPMs from scl.org and import bits from centos. > > However, there is also one feature missing on scl.org, which is to be > able to import builds that were not built in copr. This is actually > stuff for scl.org guys. We talked about it today and it seems there are > more possible ways how to do this, we just need to figure out which is > the best. This will be elaborated a bit in a separate thread. > > [1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012678.html > > Honza > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg