[CentOS-devel] kickstart extra minimal

[PatrickD Garvey]

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 10:50 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2015 05:30 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
>>>> CentOS and for solutions to support requests, why is it maintained
>>>> outside the CentOS.org domain?
>>>
>>> I guess you could extend that to github.com and then most of the stuff
>>> going on there would be wrong according to you as well right ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karanbir Singh
>>
>> Sorry for the slow response when you're answering my question.
>>
>> According to the FAQ <
>> http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_git_centos_org >,
>> "git.centos.org ... is the canonical repository for the CentOS
>> Project, and for SIGs working on variants." So, yes, I would expect
>> anything that is regularly used in building CentOS or proposed as
>> support items for CentOS' use by the community to be readily available
>> on git.centos.org.
>
> nothing on nazar should be consider centos 'project' assets. its my
> personal stuff, just like everything else karan.org would be. I am
> struggling to see why you might be confused by that.
>
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh

Manuel Wolfshant offered https://nazar.karan.org/summary/bluecain.git
to Marcos Carraro as a source for a kickstart on which to begin
building a kickstart for Marcos' purposes.

And http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/KickStart says, "At
https://nazar.karan.org/summary/bluecain.git you can find a collection
of ready-made kickstart files. Their primary goal is for testing the
CentOS deployment process but they can of course be used for any other
purpose." which, to me, indicates this collection is regularly used to
test a key CentOS process.

If these kickstart files are part of the tools used in the regular QA
flow of the CentOS project, should they not be on a identifiably
CentOS project asset?