[CentOS-devel] SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG

[Lalatendu Mohanty]

On 01/20/2015 12:03 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 19.01.2015 13:40, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>> I like #1, even if it is more work. I think it is logical thing to
>> do as SIGs should not conflict with each other when a user consumes
>> them. I mean one of the purpose of SIGs to improve the user
>> experience for consuming stuffs that are not present in CentOS
>> core.
> Being not a sig member but a user:
>
> I dislike option 1 for several reasons:
>
> 1. it complicates development a _lot_
> 2. I can't imagine any usecase where you e.g.
> want to mix xen-kernel with ovirt, as ovirt
> has no xen support (yet), so those don't need
> to be compatible (at least for now).

What about an use-case where Xen would be used with Storage SIG i.e. 
GlusterFS or Ceph or OpenAFS? Also Ovirt can be used for management of 
GlusterFS.

> 3. possibly adding more bloat:
> in order to satisfy this one-repo-for-all
> you might need to define some silly dependencies
> (libvirt requiring xen-kernel, when you don't
> need xen-kernel, but just ovirt/kvm).

Honestly I don't want to complicate stuff but just concerned that user 
does not face these kind of issues when he tries to use multiple SIGs.

-Lala
> kind regards
>
> Sven
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUvU3cAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlIh8L/RM9NGbLIdYh1Mnfq/h0vCS1
> bjWojMpiQUKaCxKsFjqAPtXSF6eXDXEiI8/Ymw9rMQMHY86WPzFltArf7hi/6phG
> NBn77hPt0QBu+KukIEPa5X6tf/xhTwf0HQw6tGBni4ynSCQVFu+soE5EFshPBZiI
> MpxEKlCJKUFMQVHXOkRQlr0bpvWN+eLWSBJ4k6bxW9SJsRsmXqWzhVhnurz/sCgx
> N+cj1h2FIHC7F/gkwXwO24Q4CFe4ahbUBvtZbFZl4rWFg8ZbywN96qRRuLnRiUPS
> hQH2YwvT4ojQL45uSp+4Z1vcyeGfyQzKY9k8yRVxg46vhfjKtNkPp6S7K2Vlg4o7
> HGcXs1IhXLvP7RJvQaY1VHJ5Yg0br+wb6kjdbTggJrIZT7hyx7KFX68W/yA5ijmm
> oGB9Jggo/oTMYOVDpMiczvs8guJMXPC2lSS72kZ6zQNJz2nbDDFZFdPHxupdqcfK
> BWie6fyGv1Iu490VDwZy9pkrbPjW2NeLGbm/3dQk2Q==
> =jjzb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel