[CentOS-devel] Centos 7.i686

Stephen John Smoogen

smooge at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 21:44:36 UTC 2015


On 8 January 2015 at 14:35, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:

> On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org
> > <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I
> >     > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild.
> >
> >     Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have
> an
> >     i686.rpm
> >
> >     If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to
> >     make them build:
> >
> >     http://fpaste.org/167305/
> >
> >     Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.
> >
> >
> >
> > Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages
> >
> > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> > supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> > supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> > tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm
> > virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm
> > xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm
> >
> > Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC
>
> Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of x86_64
> with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything built.
>
> I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have that
> will build.
>
> That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that
> will not build in i686.
>

Ah ok. The fact that you called them x86_64 but it said i686 confused me. I
would say that the lack of Xspice is going to make the system unusable in
the KVM console. Is there a place to see where it didn't build and why?


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150108/56561cde/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list