[CentOS-devel] Centos 7.i686

error: Architecture is not included: i686
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
Child return code was: 1

seems pretty common. How can I patch these as I am expecting it is
ExcludeArch?

On 8 January 2015 at 14:50, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:

> On 01/08/2015 03:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8 January 2015 at 14:35, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org
> > <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org
> <mailto:johnny at centos.org>
> >     > <mailto:johnny at centos.org <mailto:johnny at centos.org>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I
> >     >     > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to
> rebuild.
> >     >
> >     >     Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will
> not have an
> >     >     i686.rpm
> >     >
> >     >     If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a
> way to
> >     >     make them build:
> >     >
> >     >     http://fpaste.org/167305/
> >     >
> >     >     Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages
> >     >
> >     > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> >     > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> >     > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm
> >     > xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm
> >     >
> >     > Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC
> >
> >     Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of
> x86_64
> >     with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything
> built.
> >
> >     I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have
> that
> >     will build.
> >
> >     That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that
> >     will not build in i686.
> >
> >
> > Ah ok. The fact that you called them x86_64 but it said i686 confused
> > me. I would say that the lack of Xspice is going to make the system
> > unusable in the KVM console. Is there a place to see where it didn't
> > build and why?
>
> Yes, All of the build logs are here:
>
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/
>
> (in c7.00.0[2-4] or c7-updates)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150108/fdb8fda5/attachment-0004.html>