On 12/26/2014 05:24 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 25/12/14 16:54, Bob Lightfoot wrote: >> Dear Devs: >> I have been reading this mailing list since C7 came out and of >> late have not seen much progress on C7.i686 aka 32 bit. I don't see a >> SIG for it on the Centos Pages. I am wondering has the idea been >> dropped or where does it stand? > > the larger goal is to let this effort be user-led, so starting up a SIG > might be a good way to go here. I know that the original bootstrap had > most of the builds done - and Andreas ( assited by others ) had gotten > most of the bits done. There would be a need to run the updates, and > then also identify what portion of the distro is not going to make it to > i686 at all. The rest from there should be easy... > > As I did with the powerpc effort, happy to host a i686 specific google > hangout where I can walk people through the build process, and what they > need to do in order to affect builds in the centos buildsystem. > > - KB > I now have a working syslinux and kernel in git.centos.org under c7-i686 I am building those every time they update for i686 as well as x86_64 I have all the RPMs currently built, including the java-1.6.0-openjdk built that was an issue .. I'll post the RPM list and what is missing (compared to x86_64) and we can try to figure out what we need to make build (We may need to change some other things that they made exclusivearch x86_64, like they did syslinux) Then we can get an i686 test spin out. Here is the kernel and syslinux links for i686 https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!kernel.git/refs!heads!c7-i686 https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!syslinux/refs!heads!c7-i686 Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150105/df4363fe/attachment-0007.sig>