On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I > > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild. > > Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have an > i686.rpm > > If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to > make them build: > > http://fpaste.org/167305/ > > Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon. > > > Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150108/12fa9c42/attachment-0008.html>