-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19.01.2015 13:40, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > I like #1, even if it is more work. I think it is logical thing to > do as SIGs should not conflict with each other when a user consumes > them. I mean one of the purpose of SIGs to improve the user > experience for consuming stuffs that are not present in CentOS > core. Being not a sig member but a user: I dislike option 1 for several reasons: 1. it complicates development a _lot_ 2. I can't imagine any usecase where you e.g. want to mix xen-kernel with ovirt, as ovirt has no xen support (yet), so those don't need to be compatible (at least for now). 3. possibly adding more bloat: in order to satisfy this one-repo-for-all you might need to define some silly dependencies (libvirt requiring xen-kernel, when you don't need xen-kernel, but just ovirt/kvm). kind regards Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUvU3cAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlIh8L/RM9NGbLIdYh1Mnfq/h0vCS1 bjWojMpiQUKaCxKsFjqAPtXSF6eXDXEiI8/Ymw9rMQMHY86WPzFltArf7hi/6phG NBn77hPt0QBu+KukIEPa5X6tf/xhTwf0HQw6tGBni4ynSCQVFu+soE5EFshPBZiI MpxEKlCJKUFMQVHXOkRQlr0bpvWN+eLWSBJ4k6bxW9SJsRsmXqWzhVhnurz/sCgx N+cj1h2FIHC7F/gkwXwO24Q4CFe4ahbUBvtZbFZl4rWFg8ZbywN96qRRuLnRiUPS hQH2YwvT4ojQL45uSp+4Z1vcyeGfyQzKY9k8yRVxg46vhfjKtNkPp6S7K2Vlg4o7 HGcXs1IhXLvP7RJvQaY1VHJ5Yg0br+wb6kjdbTggJrIZT7hyx7KFX68W/yA5ijmm oGB9Jggo/oTMYOVDpMiczvs8guJMXPC2lSS72kZ6zQNJz2nbDDFZFdPHxupdqcfK BWie6fyGv1Iu490VDwZy9pkrbPjW2NeLGbm/3dQk2Q== =jjzb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----