[CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?

[Lokesh Mandvekar]

Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos.
some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as
well for more votes.

rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including
systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.

All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here:
https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main
pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is
RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.

WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been
adding these to my copr repo here:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM
might have something to add to this.
-- 
Lokesh
Freenode, OFTC: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150702/46574d37/attachment.sig>