[CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
Lokesh Mandvekar
lsm5 at fedoraproject.orgTue Jul 7 14:03:59 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:12:40PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > > +1 from me (which was understood I guess). I would be happy to help with > maintaining the package in virt7. Of course! All, let us know what's a good SIG to put rkt in. Or, if we need a new _Container_ SIG or whatever to put rkt, Docker and any other related tools. > > -Lala -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150707/ab32c440/attachment-0003.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list