On 07/02/2015 10:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. > some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as > well for more votes. I'm +1 for having it, either in the virt or Atomic SIG repos. My interest is primarily in being able to include it in the 4-week CentOS Atomic builds for folks who want to use rkt. Not sure how rkt does/doesn't line up with the goals of the virt SIG. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150707/52f69428/attachment-0008.sig>