[CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
sankarshan.mukhopadhyay at gmail.comFri Jun 5 12:11:53 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:36 PM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > We will be developing a issue tracking system by modifying possibly > bugzilla, or similar tool, which will be two way synced with Github. What we > aim to do is use the very Github tools as an alternate source of Content > contribution, but at the same time not depending on Github by syncing all > these content to our issue tracking system. This is one major part of the > tool chain we discussed. Hmm... let's back up a little bit. Anything that requires "modifying" bugzilla would really have to end up being part of upstream bugzilla project itself or, maintained by the specific Infra/SysOp team for the downstream project (eg. CentOS). Instead of a wholesale modification of bugzilla, would using a specific product/component combination allow you to test the sync? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list