[CentOS-devel] CentOS CLA (Contributor License Agreement)

Matthew Miller

mattdm at mattdm.org
Mon Jun 29 14:33:54 UTC 2015


On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 08:14:09AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> It's a bit too restrictive in some areas, but we can make some
> adjustments as needed.

I'm curious which areas you find too restrictive. The list of
acceptable open source / free software licenses? Or, you need to be
able to accept unlicensed contributions? (Note that the list includes a
number of very unrestrictive licenses, including CC0 and WTFPL (or NLPL
if you prefer.)

While not _necessary_, it'd be nice to have basically unified
policies here — maybe even to the point where one agreement might cover
both CentOS and Fedora contributions.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list