Hi Sven, On 06/08/2015 06:17 PM, Sven Kieske wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > at a quick glance fedmsg looks a lot > like general message passing services > like rabbitmq, zeromq etc. > > what was the intention of reinventing the wheel > yet another time? > > please enlighten me if I'm wrong and fedmsg > does something which general message bus > systems aren't capable of. fedmsg is a proposition. I am not aware of any other message bus that could suit centos's infrastructure well nor centos's infrastructure itself. The main reason for choosing fedmsg bus is it allows me to listen to it for finished builds in koji and automatically trigger CI jobs in jenkins. If CentOS's guys come with different solution how to handle CI testing for kubernetes, docker and other builds in CentOS, there does not have to be any fedmsg bus. Regards Jan > kind regards > > Sven > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJVdcAnAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlCA4MALMypyITT+ig8U1gIePkJiVn > MaNhsKX3HmrbfPIhwdRjgoMNLTCAcbif7vUtL7bdUSEZIVpKALxMaXiL9V0GbYLf > qFCmN25plU2L8h8GBS7bjuvVxUJ6lpeUeYgheiNFi9DVMK2/EehXBn3IergJomd2 > iVw3ih+X/16Ak9oiE7rfwxt/37Mv28iJdOH0aA6gcQyxbye7Np3AE7HPNVF8dclD > v+Tn6+VQFzzaCwcUnGVgwu2ulzMXvLa9ZQGdat6JDAsRi2tY2CyNTydUXduSoISE > Ea9gOtX0883LrXclpVN06HmLrEgl6SJOO+iy6LCS8XsnCgh67NBqfH3UlnKlD1PV > Yzw4xU+x1IjpAVUmG/ROLw+ofPhdPSRbBieaR4K2NLdmmKCH3XG5oKl5DWY38luN > tqwWhwGAffDIG7BaQHOPlkzCHX3AqC8TA554AmaUOFb698cujqbEio+NidJr2u6D > ncgjJ3UxwauhZAbjBjN5sSgSGpVd6INYjkUlitJ9Bg== > =6uj0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel