On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 08:14:09AM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > It's a bit too restrictive in some areas, but we can make some > adjustments as needed. I'm curious which areas you find too restrictive. The list of acceptable open source / free software licenses? Or, you need to be able to accept unlicensed contributions? (Note that the list includes a number of very unrestrictive licenses, including CC0 and WTFPL (or NLPL if you prefer.) While not _necessary_, it'd be nice to have basically unified policies here — maybe even to the point where one agreement might cover both CentOS and Fedora contributions. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader