[CentOS-devel] CBS build tags and git branches names for SCL

Jim Perrin

jperrin at centos.org
Wed Mar 4 13:27:40 UTC 2015

On 03/04/2015 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 12:56 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> On 03/04/2015 06:42 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> There is also another idea Remi suggested.. It's basically about having
>>> 3 repositories:
>>> - centos-scl => downstream of RHSCL, same content, only for CentOS users
>>> - centos-scl-devel / testing => upstream of RHSCL (we need to ensure
>>> that NEVR in this repo < previous one) and perhaps additional packages
>>> (for CentOS and RHSCL users)
>>> - centos-scl-sig / additional / stable => package NOT in RHSCL. This can
>>> be used by CentOS and RHSCL users.
>> I like this idea, but I'm not crazy about the name of the last one, as
>> it's not entirely clear what it is. I might suggest
>> centos-scl-sup(plementary). You guys are the SIG. These packages would
>> supplement what exists already.
>> This would be a good repo for the 500-odd perl module scl packages we've
>> been contacted about as well.
> why not just put these in CentOS-Extras/ ? that only has content not
> otherwise in the distro upstream.

This should be sig specific, and requires sig content. I don't think
Extras would be a viable solution here.

Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list