Exactly. It's like choosing Vmware for your dev cloud after finding out they violate the GPL, maybe a too strong example, but you get the idea. Everyone is on github already and the site has good functionality, it might probably be the single most important move to encourage contributions. Yes, github is also one big SPOF, but use it for what it's best: collaboration, use git.centos.org for availability and authority. /IMHO Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists at karan.org> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Sent: Saturday, 7 March, 2015 08:38:02 > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious > On 03/06/2015 10:03 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: >>> Should we be more explicitly considering gitlab.com then? There's >>> a conversion path from gitorious. > > One thing that leaves a sour taste is that its the gitlab folks causing > gitorious.org to shut down - it looks clearly like a move to consolidate > a competitive resource. > > Does gitlab.com give us anything more than git.centos.org ? If not, we > might as well go where the users are. > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel