-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/03/15 14:27, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 06/03/15 20:57, Karsten Wade wrote: <snip> > > Now that Gitorious is shutting down, and that in the meantime we > have several git repositories hosted under github.com/CentOS, all > those facts lead me to the simple conclusion that hosting now > t_functional under Github.com/CentOS makes just sense. (and it > seems collaboration on github is easy, as we got several PR on > those git repositories, while very few on gitorious, probably > because almost everybody had an account on github, but not on > gitorious) > > Now, a longer debate around "do we have to move from Github to > something else" is then another debate, but wider than the > "t_functional repository needs to move now from gitorious" > > So, I'd say "+1" on the move to github (short-term) Trying to resurrect that thread a little bit. If nodoby has real objection/doesn't mind about moving from gitorious to github, I'll proceed to that migration in the following days (as Gitorious.org will shut down end of May) Please note that this concerns *only* the current tests ran for QA validation (aka t_functional - see https://gitorious.org/testautomation/t_functional/), so we're not speaking about the srpms/source/spec/etc that are on git.centos.org (which will remain authoritative, and also from where the QA hosts are fetching t_functional from) Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVKBd0ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5MHACcCkS4IclPNTd2qLF43n8UfGc/ LQwAoIJuM7VpV8ggFONRtu+aW5La/oRE =nJsA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----