[CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious

Wed May 6 12:15:25 UTC 2015
Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/03/15 14:27, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 06/03/15 20:57, Karsten Wade wrote:
<snip>
> 
> Now that Gitorious is shutting down, and that in the meantime we
> have several git repositories hosted under github.com/CentOS, all
> those facts lead me to the simple conclusion that hosting now
> t_functional under Github.com/CentOS makes just sense. (and it
> seems collaboration on github is easy, as we got several PR on
> those git repositories, while very few on gitorious, probably
> because almost everybody had an account on github, but not on
> gitorious)
> 
> Now, a longer debate around "do we have to move from Github to 
> something else" is then another debate, but wider than the 
> "t_functional repository needs to move now from gitorious"
> 
> So, I'd say "+1" on the move to github (short-term)

Trying to resurrect that thread a little bit.

If nodoby has real objection/doesn't mind about moving from gitorious
to github, I'll proceed to that migration in the following days (as
Gitorious.org will shut down end of May)
Please note that this concerns *only* the current tests ran for QA
validation (aka t_functional - see
https://gitorious.org/testautomation/t_functional/), so we're not
speaking about the srpms/source/spec/etc that are on git.centos.org
(which will remain authoritative, and also from where the QA hosts are
fetching t_functional from)

Cheers,


- -- 

Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlVKBd0ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5MHACcCkS4IclPNTd2qLF43n8UfGc/
LQwAoIJuM7VpV8ggFONRtu+aW5La/oRE
=nJsA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----