[CentOS-devel] [scl.org] Fwd: Re: bug reporting for slcs ?

Honza Horak

hhorak at redhat.com
Wed Nov 11 08:55:41 UTC 2015


I see, but on the other hand it gives us ability to clone bugs to RHSCL 
product since many issues in centos collections will be reproducible in 
RHSCL packages as well.

With other packages that are rebuilt in centos (non-SCL), people report 
issues into bugzilla.redhat.com as well, don't they?

Honza

On 11/07/2015 01:36 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
> While I'm fine with this, it does create a split between where most
> CentOS bugs are filed and where the scl-sig ones are filed.
>
> Perhaps an excuse to revisit unifying the bug reporting?
>
> On Friday, November 6, 2015, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com
> <mailto:hhorak at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Sorry for late response, I don't think we need anything on
>     bugs.centos.org <http://bugs.centos.org>, we already have this space:
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=softwarecollections.org
>
>     Honza
>
>     On 11/05/2015 12:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>         Do we need a SCLo specific section on bugs.centos.org- and maybe get
>         Honza setup as primary developer for that ?
>
>         regards,
>
>
>         -------- Forwarded Message --------
>         Subject: Re: [scl.org <http://scl.org>] bug reporting for slcs ?
>         Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:38:03 +0100
>         From: Jarek Polok <Jaroslaw.Polok at cern.ch>
>         Organisation: CERN
>         To: sclorg at redhat.com
>
>         Since the problem is sclo-specific [ upstream package
>         not affected ], submitted bug report here:
>
>         https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9705
>
>         (as 'Project Buildsys' category 'general')
>
>         Cheers
>
>         Jarek
>
>         On 10/29/2015 04:07 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>
>             Where bugs for SCLo collections are to be reported ?
>
>             bugs.centos.org <http://bugs.centos.org> does not seem to
>             have SCLo project
>             defined ?
>
>             We have just seen a (minor) bug in rh-ruby22 collection
>             (wrong shebang paths in some tools)
>
>             My understanding is that that collection is a rebuilt
>             of upstream RH one: in that case the bug is to be
>             reported to CentOS/SCLo or to RH directly ?
>
>             Thanks
>
>             Jarek
>
>             __
>             -------------------------------------------------------
>             _ Jaroslaw_Polok __________________ CERN - IT/OIS/WLS _
>             _ http://cern.ch/~jpolok ________ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
>             ______________________________________+41_75_411_9487 _
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             SCLorg mailing list
>             SCLorg at redhat.com
>             https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CentOS-devel mailing list
>     CentOS-devel at centos.org
>     https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list