[CentOS-devel] [Gluster-users] What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG?

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:19:34AM -0800, Prasun Gera wrote:
> It would be nice to have RHGS's equivalent in CentOS, keeping with the
> general theme of CentOS. Any reason why that hasn't been considered ?

I do not know if this has been considered before I joined the Storage
Special Interest Group. The SIGs that are part of the CentOS Community
are free to provide newer packages from upstream projects, or even
projects that are not part of RHEL or its add-ons. A more complete
desctiption of what a SIG can provide/do is available on the CentOS wiki
at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup .

The RHGS product tracks the upstream Gluster packages pretty close. I do
not think there is a need to provide a rebuild of the RHGS packages.
That said, if there is anyone interested in providing those, speak up
and join the Storage SIG!
  https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage

Thanks,
Niels


> 
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:25 AM, C.L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/10/2015 09:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gluster users running on CentOS!
> >>
> >> As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable Gluster
> >> releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage SIG [0]. We
> >> would like to know what version of Gluster and which versions of CentOS
> >> are most wanted by our users.
> >>
> >> The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the time.
> >> This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster Community.
> >> Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and will not receive
> >> any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released early 2016 [1].
> >>
> >> We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but CentOS-5 can
> >> only get recent versions of the Gluster client.
> >>
> >> Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in the
> >> CentOS Storage SIG:
> >>
> >>   - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included
> >>   - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included
> >>
> >>   - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you?
> >>   - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you?
> >>
> >>   - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you?
> >>   - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you?
> >>
> >>   - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody?
> >>   - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.6: nobody?
> >>   - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody?
> >>
> >>
> >> Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few
> >> months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is
> >> x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me
> >> or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster.
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Niels
> >>
> >>
> >> 0. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage
> >> 1. https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/
> >>
> >>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  My production environments runs Gluster 3.7 for CentOS-7/6. I am not
> > planning to use CentOS-5.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >

> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20151127/fb3e7687/attachment-0004.sig>