Ironically, I work in an environment, where a usb stick is forbidden, but that said, I usually try to use the liveDVD's. I only have one system that has only a cd drive (no dvd), but the older releases support it just fine. So that's cool. -----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux! Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:26 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 liveCD survey Fabian, I think the browser is the one component you must not remove from the Live "CD". I agree with Manuel, just take as much space as is needed to do a reasonable job and make sure dd-ing to USB stick works. Don't publish handicaped ISOs. :) Most people's machines nowadays hardly even have a DVD reader, let alone a CD one; e.g the last laptop I bought (2 years ago) came without such optical unit. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fabian Arrotin" <arrfab at centos.org> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 November, 2015 14:42:43 > Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 liveCD survey > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > While working on the next 7.1511 Live media, I discovered that the > size for the actual CentOS 7 LiveCD would be more than 700MB. > > It's due to some packages being now bigger and bigger, also due to the > big Gnome 3.8 -> 3.14 rebase. > One obvious package I can remove from the packages manifest (which > itself is consuming more and more space) is Firefox. > > If I remove it from the packages manifest (only for LiveCD, it will > obviously stay for the LiveGnome and LiveKDE DVD iso images), it's > then back to 650 MB, so that would mean that one would still be able > to burn it on a CD. > > But the real question is then : does that even make sense ? for each > release, we're now fighting with disk space constraints, and I'm each > time removing packages from that LiveCD image. If we remove Firefox > itself, that would mean that such LiveCD would be useful just for > people willing to "test" CentOS on their hardware, but that would be a > basic Gnome desktop. > > It builds/runs fine, can be installed too (like before), but I'd like > your opinion about this. > > Cheers, > > - -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | > twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlZVyOMACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4w4ACdEZZJbJwEXaq1BrsorEW9YZSR > EcYAn3BwnoHgwRV97f0yAKaGspvaux+u > =OXeJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel at centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5647 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20151125/041950a2/attachment-0008.p7s>